« Childish Development | Main | Paint, tents, and the nobel prize »

Awareness: Ecological footprinting and the system

Last time I wrote about my plan to make a plan (resisting the urge to simply jump ahead and start "going green" without one) to follow my ecological footprint. I wrote that the first step of the planning process was the "A" (awareness) of ecological footprinting.

Now this "awareness" naturally means that I understand what ecological footprinting is, but it also means that I should understand my own reason for using this tool. My reason is further based on:

  • Awareness of how the ecological system I am a part of works
  • Awareness of the current state of that ecological system
  • Awareness of my own ethics and values

While I had originally intended to lump these all together into one post, as I began to write it grew, and grew, and grew. To make it less tiresome to read, I will simply break it down into three more "bite-sized" posts.

What is ecological footprinting? ↑menu

This is something I have written about before, and has been covered well by many other sites, so, at the risk of further boring anyone who has made it this far, I will pretty much copy and paste:

The Ecological Footprinting is an accounting process used to quantifiably measure the total area required to produce the food and fiber that a single person, family, or organization consumes, absorb its waste, and provide space for its infrastructure.

Footprinting by itself does not regulate how you live, nor does it pass any moral judgments. It doesn't tell you what you should or should not do, it doesn't tell you if what you are doing is "good" or "bad". It is simply an accounting tool , and as with business accounting, the numbers, in relation to the goals, speak for themselves. By tracking our footprint, we can estimate the environmental impact a population's consumption habits have with regards to:

  • Land and water resources used to raise livestock, harvest crops, or mine materials.
  • Energy resources needed to manufacture and ship the goods to our door.
  • Energy resources required to recycle waste.
  • Land and energy resources used to assimilate non-recyclable waste.

How does our ecosystem work? ↑menu

As huge of a topic as this is, my guess is that most people have some basic understanding if only based on simple intuition. Even answering these questions based with my liberal arts background I can see that I have some understanding of at least how the ecosystem does not work.

  1. How much earth is there?
  2. Are the earth's ecosystem resources infinite?
  3. How much of the ecosystem resources do humans use?
  4. How much of the ecosystem resources are humans expected to use in the future?
  5. How many other species do we share that ecosystem with?
  6. What are those species' resource needs?
  7. At our current rate of consumption, how much will be left for future generations?

As for how it does work, I'm obviously not qualified to go into details, but I am confident enough to say that, in a broader sense, it all boils down to a few realities based on thermodynamics. While the ethical reasons for following my ecological footprint are certainly not shared by everyone, there is just no way to get around the laws of thermodynamics, no matter who you are.

Basic Scientific Basis for Ecological Footprint

  • The earth is a closed system.
  • In a closed system, energy and matter are neither created nor destroyed.
  • Energy and matter tend to disperse.
  • Humans consume energy quality.
  • Plants, through the process of photosynthesis, are the primary producers of material quality.

Someday I may get into a deeper explanation of what I mean by these bullet points, but for now... Basically, what this is supposed to be saying is that what we have here now is what we get -we have to make due with it. New material resources do not spontaneously appear, and all of our energy resources originate from the sun. Likewise, our waste does not spontaneously disappear. Some waste can readily be broken down and re-integrated into the system. This takes an input of energy, which comes from the sun.

* * *
Next time, I continue my gaining awareness stage by looking at the current reality regarding the state of human consumption and interaction with the ecosystem.
Before I go on:

I want to explain that this whole ecological footprint series is supposed to be two things...

  1. an account of my own experience measuring and lowering my own ecological footprint. As such, it will naturally be personal and filled with my own personal opinions about how I should live my life.
  2. a resource , helpful for anyone else who may want to follow along (I can cream can't I), to do so. As such, I guess it should be more matter-of-factual, less polluted with my own opinions. The last thing I want to do is write another bible, telling people how to live their lives. My goals is simply to illustrate how this tool can be used.

Please bear with me as I try to find the balance.

Comments

How can you describe the earth as a closed system when every day we are receiving billions and billions of btu’s via the sun (an outside source)? On the surface it would seem that using that energy input we will be able to solve all the remaining problems we have with the exception of global warming.

"How can you describe the earth as a closed system when every day we are receiving billions and billions of btu’s via the sun (an outside source)?"

A good question, and one that I was snagged on for a while, but the answer lies in the difference between a closed system and an isolated system.

An isolated system is one in which neither mass nor energy flows in or out.

A closed system is one in which the exchange of energy with the outside world is permitted but the exchange of mass is not.

Don't ask me to go into detail about what this difference means either.... I have very little idea.

In the case of the earth, some meteors and such do come in, but on such a small scale that the earth is, in effect, a closed system. As you noted, energy from the sun does come in, and at the same time is is being radiated out as heat energy. (of course, if something in the atmosphere prevents it from radiating out, the earth may heat up slightly)

"On the surface it would seem that using that energy input we will be able to solve all the remaining problems we have with the exception of global warming."

Yes it would. Solar energy is capable of fulfilling all our current energy needs thousands of times over. -regardless of if this is captured in the form of PV, wind (also a result of heat from sun heating masses of air that interact with cooler air masses), hydro (aslo a result of heat from the sun causing water to evaporate then rain down, or in the case of currents, caused by the heating of large masses of water.)

This is why it seems so silly to be so reliant on fossile fuels (also created using energy from the sun of course). This is one reason that the idea of a closed system earth is important, The carbon that has been long since taken out of our biosphere is being released along with the energy stored in it. Although energy flows in and out freely, the carbon (being matter) stays. The only problem is that it is now acculumlating in the biosphere.

Post a comment