According to my scientific Internet poll, Edwards isn't helping Kerry's chances much.
I seldom see any web-sites (blogs) supporting Bush, most sites I read are exactly the opposite. I wondered though, is this just a false indication that Kerry will clean-up? Maybe the blogging community is just where a certain type of people hang out, or, maybe it's proof for the echo-chamber argument, just like when every one thought Dean would still be around... just because everyone thought that Dean would still be around. Maybe I just don't read enough blogs.
Whatever the reason, my recent internet poll indicates that my daily blog-read gives me a very skewed view of what will actually happen in the next election. The results are in, and it's not looking good for Kerry.
| Date | Google results for "I'm voting for Kerry" |
Google results for "I'm voting for Bush" |
| June 20 | 1,860 | 2,350 |
| June 21 | 1,840 | 2,360 |
| June 22 | 1,840 | 2,370 |
| June 24 | 1,770 | 2,300 |
| June 27 | 1,690 | 2,230 |
| June 30 | 1,660 | 2,180 |
| July 8 | 1,760 | 2,200 |
Of course, there is no way to know how many of the "I'm voting for Bush" hits were from last election, or even his father's elections... if we divide Bush's 2,200 by the four election his name has appeared in, he'll only be getting 550 votes this year from people who write on web-sites.
Hopefully, most of your I'm voting for Bush hits came from statements like There is no way in hell I'm voting for Bush.
I sure hope the poll is right about the Bush numbers. A Kerry pesidency scares the hell out of me. Unlike democrates in the past I have no idea what Kerry really stands for (excepting of course himself). IF Sandy Berger is the best he can do for advisors, what are we in for?